Search for: "State v. Below" Results 281 - 300 of 23,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2009, 12:44 pm
Below, Natasha Fedder previews Johnson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:48 am by Erin Miller
United States, Schwab v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 1:55 pm
Gene Fidell reports in a comment to a post below that the Supreme Court has asked the Solicitor General to respond to the cert petition in Stevenson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:00 am by Trusts EstatesProf
As I have previously discussed, the Obama administration has stated that it will file an amicus brief in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 11:06 am by CivPro Blogger
See announcement below: Max Huffman (Indiana) and Austen Parrish (Southwestern) have written an amicus brief in the case British American Tobacco v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 8:32 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to briefs and opinions below: Tuesday, Nov. 2 Sossamon v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:01 am
I wanted to offer a few thoughts in response to Doug Berman's post (mentioned by Jonathan below) about Judge Posner's sentencing opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:37 am by tracey
Regina (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 681;  [2011] WLR (D)  190 “When deciding whether to grant leave to remain in the United Kingdom to a non-EEA economic migrant it was not open to the Secretary of State to treat the certificate of sponsorship issued by the migrant’s employer as invalid in reliance on the fact that the migrant’s job fell below the relevant NVQ/SVQ level specified in… [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Last October, I wrote a long post on a new Tenth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm by Roy Ginsburg
[Readers:  Set forth below is a thoughtful and detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's decision of Walmart v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 2:22 am
United States, 06-6330 (per Booker, crack guidelines are advisory only; judge may consider crack/powder disparity in sentencing below the guidelines).United States v. [read post]