Search for: "State v. Boots" Results 281 - 300 of 747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 1:44 pm by Rumpole
 In the United States of America court proceedings are, with rare exceptions,  open to the public. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:28 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
More Blog Posts: Man Sues Wal-Mart after Allegedly Faulty Boots Cause Serious Injury, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, September 23, 2015 State Supreme Court Finds in Favor of Slip-and-Fall Victim on Sovereign Immunity Issue, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, October 7, 2015 [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm
So after the two-year terms expired (in 2018), under the Court of Appeal's rule, there (1) wasn't anyone elected to these positions on the City Council, and (2) the old officeholders were automatically booted out.At one point, Justice Sanchez's opinion tries to make hay out of the fact that these three officeholders didn't run in 2020, saying "Mission Viejo did hold a municipal election in 2020 but Sachs, Bucknum, and Raths did not run for reelection. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:23 pm
The alleged clothes, in this case, consist of flame-retardant pants and jacket, work gloves, metatarsal boots (work boots containing steel or other strong material to protect the toes and instep), a hard hat, safety glasses, ear plugs, and a "snood" (a hood that covers the top of the head, the chin and the neck). [read post]