Search for: "State v. Brain " Results 281 - 300 of 2,657
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2012, 7:34 pm
A long-time secretarial employee of the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”), Clarice Sanchez, suffered irreversible brain damage after falling at work. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) correctly determined that a Korean biopharmaceutical company did not use in commerce the mark for a nutritional product that purportedly improves brain performance, the United States Court for the Federal Circuit has held. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:48 am by Jon Sands
  The state courts did not unreasonably deny a claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate possible organic brain damage. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 8:31 am
"However, the State recognized that this brain injury did not diminish Schutz's ability to understand his actions. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 6:27 am
By the time they arrived the damage had accelerated; the delay resulted in brain damage. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 8:58 pm by Matthew Nelson
On Friday, October 29, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court decided In re Certified Question (Waeschle v. [read post]