Search for: "State v. Character" Results 281 - 300 of 7,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by ASAD KHAN
Specifically, s 117A(2) stated that regard must be had to the statement in s 117C(6) that, in the absence of very compelling circumstances, the public interest “required” deportation. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm by Allard Knook
The Court held that that the procedure established under Art. 259 TFEU was designed to obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State was in breach of EU law and to terminate that conduct (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 15/76 and 16/76 France v Commission [1979]; Case C-456/05 Commission v Germany [2007]; and Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden and Others v API and Commission [2010]).Thus, as the aim of the Treaty was to achieve… [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
  Nicklin J stated that “(i) The statement must be recognisable as comment, as distinct from an imputation of fact. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
LV alleged that in this assessment the Board of Appeal ‘openly’ infringed the principle that distinctive character may arise from use as part of a registered mark or in conjunction with a registered mark, if, as a consequence of that use, that sign may serve to identify, in the minds of the relevant persons, the goods to which it relates as originating from a particular undertaking. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:56 am by christopher
448 F.3d 605 (2006) BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am by Terry Hart
The task for courts there is to assess “whether and to what extent the use at issue has a purpose or character different from the original. [read post]