Search for: "State v. City of Seattle" Results 281 - 300 of 537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2014, 5:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1978 opinion in Oliphant v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by Ben
 The photo depicts three New York City firefighters hoisting an American flag amid the rubble at the World Trade Center hours after the attacks - Palin’s Sarah PAC posted a copy of the photo on its fundraising website and Facebook page without permission. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the state of Michigan in Schuette v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm by Gail Heriot
Seattle School District was itself based on Hunter v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am by Michael F. Smith
Given the fundamental question it poses regarding an electorate’s right to amend its own state constitution, Schuette v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:24 pm by Florian Mueller
A federal jury in Seattle has already rendered a verdict on the Microsoft v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:10 pm by Ron Coleman
This reminds me of how Starbucks, which calls Seattle home, tried to jam up its hometown roller derby league, the Rat City Rollergirls, over a trademark issue [covered at LOC here -- RDC]. . . [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 8:07 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)Story County (Iowa) District Court Judge Dale Ruigh last week ruled in Beef Products Inc. et al. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
  The city school district had adopted a student busing plan to combat de facto racial school segregation, but the voters of Washington then amended the state constitution to ban such plans. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Druid City Hospital Board, 459 So.2d 818, 822-23 (Ala. 1984), which uniquely held that a hospital could be liable as a “seller” of a product under an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose theory. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am by Vik Amar
Seattle School District No. 1 that flirted with a ban on individualized race consideration, and his separate writing in City of Richmond v. [read post]