Search for: "State v. Cooper" Results 281 - 300 of 8,496
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2023, 7:55 am by JURIST Staff
The Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case titled Habib Ullah Energy Limited and another v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
By instating both tribal and state jurisdiction over a common class of offenders without any structure for coordinating prosecutions, VAWA and Castro-Huerta have necessitated a new kind of inter-sovereign cooperation — in other words, a federalism problem. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Frank Cranmer
: on Mrs K Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 am by kblocher@hslf.org
In November 2020, the DOJ filed a complaint against big cat exhibitors Jeffrey and Lauren Lowe (of “Tiger King” fame) for AWA and Endangered Species Act violations (United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
The second was to establish an annual Forum on Business and Human Rights " to discuss trends and challenges in the implementation of the Guiding Principles and promote dialogue and cooperation on issues linked to business and human rights" (A/HRC/RES/17/4, ¶12). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The SRO’s responsibilities would extend to fraud prevention and discipline, consumer protection, promotion of free trade and facilitation of cooperation between regulators. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 18 July 2023 there was a hearing in the case of Coopers Fire Limited v Mcloughlin. [read post]
  Foreign Official is broadly defined in the FCPA and includes officers or employees of: (i) any non-US government, whether national, state, provincial, or local; (ii) any department, instrumentality, or agency of a non-US government; (iii) any state-owned or controlled company; (iv) any non-US political party; and (v) any public international organisation (e.g., the World Bank), as well as any candidate for non-US political office. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]