Search for: "State v. Cotton"
Results 281 - 300
of 541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
" In January the US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a previous Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that the Clean Water Act did not regulate pesticide application "into, over, or near ‘waters of the United States'" as long as EPA labeling requirements were followed.The Sixth Circuit ruled in "National Cotton Council v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
The great state of Oklahoma is not O.K. with the Tenth Circuit’s holding that the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals clearly violated Beck v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:58 am
In Cargill v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 3:36 am
Also, in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:47 am
Cotton stated in a December 10th media release, “Fathers have an obligation to care for their children. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
AUSTIN — The timeline played the starring role during the opening arguments at the jury trial of the United States v Paul Kruse. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:09 am
Miyoko’s Kitchen v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:00 pm
(citing NP Anderson Cotton Exch., L.P. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
Those cotton-tipped swabs aren't labeled for removing ear wax.Physicians are permitted to make off-label use of drugs and devices and, to our eyes, off-label use does not affect the preemption analysis.First, Riegel v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:57 am
United States, a recent decision of the Court of International Trade. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 9:44 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:17 am
Co. v. 356 Bales of Cotton, 1 Pet. 511 (1828), which is sometimes referred to as Canter, after a claimant in the case. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
As it explained in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:24 pm
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
