Search for: "State v. Covington"
Results 281 - 300
of 340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2025, 7:45 am
How are “global” law firms (v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
State of Ohio, No.7-3808 (6th Cir. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:29 am
EU Member States’ courts will need to assess this factual question as well as the thorny question of assigning a monetary value to this “fear”, on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 10:14 am
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:59 am
When asked to describe the impact, the employee stated, “[v]ery light, not harsh at all,” and said he hit the plaintiff with his shoulder. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Applied Sierra Club v. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 12:13 pm
Bureau of Wash., D.C. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
California – On Heels of Ridley-Thomas Indictment, LA County Hires Firm to Launch Sweeping Audit Los Angeles Daily News – Ryan Carter and City News Service | Published: 2/4/2022 Los Angeles County hired the law firm Covington & Burling to conduct the audit of its contracting policies and processes and review all its major service contracts. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 2:24 pm
Part V: Domestic Violence Information If you were or are a victim of domestic violence or abuse, you will complete Part V. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
The following is a Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide for the State of Michigan. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
., State Consumer Protection Law (2022). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm
But here’s the twist: This new, scientifically-driven awareness of the problem of false confessions has emerged only in the decades since the United States Supreme Court last visited the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments’ voluntariness doctrine in 1991’s Arizona v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:19 am
He wondered why, if a state treated a matter as within a hearsay exception, the Confrontation Clause should require exclusion.There was some irony here, because Justice Breyer’s concurrence in Lilly v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Schwartz, a law professor at Touro College, writes that the decision in Paul v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Wingerter v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
He stated that it wasn't bad as he had expected, given the war-time circumstances: "We have 75 students, and we haven't had to admit any women. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Local groups oppose the project because its proposed location places it in the watershed of two of the state’s highest quality native trout streams and on a major bat and bird migratory route. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:12 am
Mercante, a partner at Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, analyze the recent Supreme Court decision in Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]
