Search for: "State v. Crews" Results 281 - 300 of 1,245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
c) Mutiny or conspiracy of two or more members of the crew or other persons on board of a vessel on the high seas, for the purpose of rebelling against the authority of the Captain or Commander of such vessel, or by fraud or violence taking possession of such vessel. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 3:43 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
Each of the Port state authorities have announced particular emphases for their CICs: the Paris, Tokyo, Black Sea, Mediterranean, Indian Ocean, Abuja and Viña del Mar MoUs, which cover the seas in Europe, the Indian Ocean, West and Central Africa and Latin America,  will focus on safety of navigation and ships’ compliance with the applicable requirements of SOLAS Chapter V. the Caribbean MoU, which covers states and territories with coasts on the… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The act by any person, being or not being one of the crew of a vessel, of taking possession of such vessel by fraud or violence. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:11 am by Trevor Cutaiar
On August 5, 2015, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Glaze v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 10:00 pm by Jim Walker
The cruise line never reported the incident to the Alaska State Troopers, or the FBI, or the flag state. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:29 am
Other TV crews are filming just a few feet away from the father and son, directly in the alleged line of fire. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 10:13 pm by Robert Boggs
Just this week on January 18th, the Supreme Court of the State of Washington in Davis v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 10:13 pm by Robert Boggs
Just this week on January 18th, the Supreme Court of the State of Washington in Davis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:20 am by Jim Walker
The name of the lawsuit is Patricia Sandoval et al. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Douglas (Oregon State University Press, 2000), and “Marbury,” Stanford Law Review 44 (1992):  219-260. [read post]