Search for: "State v. D. A. R."
Results 281 - 300
of 16,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2012, 2:50 am
Merchant International Co Ltd v Natsionalna Aktsionerna Kompaniia Naftogaz Ukrainy: [2012] EWCA Civ 196; [2012] WLR (D) 51 “An English court was entitled to consider whether a foreign judgment obtained in a Convention state had contravened the Human Rights Convention where there was strong factual evidence to rebut the presumption that the procedures of other Convention states complied with article 6. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
” Riley v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:17 am
Regina (Aguilar Quila and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (AIRE Centre and others intervening) Regina (Bibi and another) v Same (Same intervening) [2011] UKSC 45; [2011] WLR (D) 291 “An immigration rule designed to deter forced marriages, which prevented the granting of leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as a spouse if either of the parties to the marriage was aged under 21, was an unjustified interference with the right to… [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
Parker, Attorneys for Appellant Dustin D. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:05 pm
Citicorp, No. 12-0062 (D. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:04 am
In Smith v Smith, 2018 WL 953338 (D. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:19 am
Contents include:Tore Wig & Espen Geelmuyden Rød, Cues to Coup Plotters: Elections as Coup Triggers in Dictatorships Benjamin E. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:30 am
RK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 456; [2011] WLR (D) 147“There was no general rule to the effect that any returned asylum seeker who would be in a position to avoid risk of persecution only by falsely claiming to support the regime in his home country would be entitled to asylum; rather, it was necessary to make a close examination of the particular circumstances of the individual, as each case would turn on its own facts. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:19 am
BG v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1478 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 192 “On an appeal under section 10(1)(4) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 against the renewal of a non-derogating control order, it was not part of the court’s task to determine whether the earlier decision under section 2(1)(a) to make the original control order had been or was now flawed. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm
” United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:15 am
C&D Zodiac, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-1496, 03 October 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:23 pm
R. 26(b)(1). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 6:45 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 6:45 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:30 am
Anyway, the case is State of Nevada v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 10:42 am
Today’s decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:14 am
The post Indiana becomes first state since Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 3:31 pm
(NLSA obtains the forms and makes them available at the Supreme Court Law Library as a service to our patrons.)We do not have all forms obtained by the NSLA, but do have the following:1040, 1040 A, 1040 EZ, 1040-V, 1040 X, 1040 Schedules A, B, C, C-EZ, D, E, EIC, F, R and SE, 2106, 2441, 3903, 4562, 4868 (First Extension), 5695, 8283, 8812, 8822, 8829, 8863, and 8949. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:58 am
United States Postal Service v. [read post]
