Search for: "State v. D. A. R."
Results 281 - 300
of 16,106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
As one commenter stated: “In the hours and days following a cybersecurity breach, companies must quickly and efficiently contain, minimize, and remedy any damage or loss resultin [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:31 am
Co-sponsors of the bill include Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL), John Kennedy (R-LA), and Roger Wicker (R-MS). [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
La note conceptuelle de l'événement de cette année et de plus amples informations sont disponibles sur le site web du Forum.Tous les acteurs concernés de toutes les régions sont invités à s’inscrire.INSCRIPTIONS OUVERTESParticipez au Forum pour partager des expériences et vous informer sur les dernières initiatives visant à promouvoir une conduite responsable des entreprises… [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 8:23 am
D. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 7:53 am
In France, legal persons can enter into a public interest judicial agreement (“Convention judiciaire d’intérêt public”) for bribery offences. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Further, in US v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Charles R. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:00 pm
[3] State of Utah et al. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
Decisions from the Federal Circuit Court can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:38 am
"While not specifically related to the EU proposal, I'd also like to quote the former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Randall R. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 10:09 am
The case, Murray v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
R. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
By Philip Won & Adrienne R. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 11:33 am
R. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 11:41 pm
A Matter of Perspective As another example, consider Steinberg v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
If you know of one, I'd love to know what it is. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:02 am
Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) quoted from the 1919 decision in Schenck v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
