Search for: "State v. D. Z." Results 281 - 300 of 417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Adds Karen (whom you can email here): "I worked at an R&D company where we routinely received these letters addressed to the "Patent Department" or "IP Office". [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am by admin
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:57 am
Three new states are now TMView-searchable: Romania, Lithuania and Sweden. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
ITC (ITC 337 Update) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Stay pending reissue: Timing and blog reliability: Tyco Fire Products v Victaulic (Patently-O) District Court E D Texas: Defense win on fringement & invalidity in Judge Davis’ court: Alcatel-Lucent v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post-Grant) District Court C D California: TP tops Despatch as court rules up is not down: Despatch Industries v TP Solar (Green Patent Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Late Allergan Reduction – “The allergans” requires all allergans not just one or more: Late Allergen Reduction v Dynarex (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Mondis – Public statements by foreign… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
Calypso Capital Management, LP (TTABlog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Legal effect of consent to use and register name of a living individual when the name is already a trademark: Warren v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
A.V.E.L.A., Inc (IP Whiteboard) Precedential No. 22: TTAB renders split decision in CURE4KIDS 2(d) oppositions: American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) The Johnson & Johnson Acuvue compulsory license – M D Florida decision in Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
(IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Accused infringer need not test prior art patented products to prove invalidity: Viskase Cos., Inc. v. [read post]