Search for: "State v. Delay"
Results 281 - 300
of 13,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 2:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
It indicated that 'the United States does not propose to use the unavoidable delays defense as a get-out-of-jail-free card' concerning liability. . . [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:46 pm
Check the Bloate v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:09 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:12 am
Ok, State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 1:16 pm
United States raises claims under the Speedy Trial Act related to delays in jury trials during the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:44 pm
One case is State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:20 am
The court's ruling is consistent with Halloway v State Farm Ins. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
In discussing the Crown’s delay, the Court cites the SCC in R. v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am
The post President Trump Deliberately Creating Constitutional Crisis, Delay appeared first on . [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
The remedy is to fix the delays. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 2:39 pm
As other federal appeals court have, while they studied state appeals, the Fifth Circuit granted the requested delay, to last while the appeal proceeds. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:00 am
In some respects, the DC Circuit's decision in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:09 pm
Today, in Cope v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:12 pm
The Constitutional Court in State Information Technology Agency Soc Limited v Gijima Holdings (Pty) Ltd held that a state applicant seeking the judicial review of their own decision may not rely on the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 2000 and must do so in terms of the principle of legality. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
When the state court refused on Wednesday to delay Schwab’s execution date, one of the judges joining in that denial said that Schwab’s proper next step should be to seek a stay from the Supreme Court. [read post]
