Search for: "State v. Dell" Results 281 - 300 of 523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
 In her statement to the Commons, the Secretary of State said [with added links]: Protecting children is at the heart of our online harms agenda, and is key to wider Government priorities. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
 This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more… [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:53 am
Nowhere in the complaint does the plaintiff allege, at a minimum, conduct by the college "acting under color of law which deprived the injured party of a right, privilege or immunity guaranteed by the Constitution or the laws of the United States" (DiPalma v Phelan, 81 NY2d 754, 756; see Sharrock v Dell Buick-Cadillac, 45 NY2d 152, 158; Moghimzadeh v College of St. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:17 am
., on Saturday, May 4, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Climate change, Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, Executive Compensation, Index funds, Pay for performance, Shareholder rights, Shareholder value, Shareholder voting, Sustainability Operating Principles for Impact Management Posted by Irina Likhachova, International Finance Corporation, on Sunday, May 5, 2019 Tags: Accountability, Asset management, Corporate… [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm by Bexis
  The other supposedly controlling case, O'Dell v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:25 pm
Federal Communications Commission, Wi-LAN chief executive Jim Skippen told an investor conference call.The FCC is requiring that content-screening technology be included in all televisions, video recorders and other broadcast reception devices sold in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
  First, the Court relisted in Delling v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This principle was described by the Supreme Court of Canada in Dell Computer Corp. v. [read post]