Search for: "State v. Dolan " Results 281 - 300 of 370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Nixon was correct rather than deferring to the state court’s interpretation under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and whether the state court’s interpretation of Florida v. [read post]
 That decision came in June of 2015, with the ruling in California Building Industry Association (CBIA) v. [read post]
 That decision came in June of 2015, with the ruling in California Building Industry Association (CBIA) v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
Johns River Water Management District, Dolan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 5:48 pm by Bernadette Duran-Brown
 (1987) 483 U.S. 825, and whether the dedication requirement is “roughly proportional” to the impact of the proposed development, as set forth in Dolan v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Conor McEvily
  At the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Jess Bravin covers Reichle v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:56 am
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:40 pm by cdw
” [via Lexisone] Dolan Darling v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:25 am by Edward Foley
Senate seat with less than a third of the votes, 32.2%, beating among other candidates non-denialist Matt Dolan (who came in third with 23.3%). [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Welfare, No. 06-4628 In an employment-discrimination suit against a state agency, denial of a motion to dismiss is reversed where: 1) by voluntarily removing the matter from state to federal court, the state had waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in a federal forum; but 2) a removing state retains all defenses it would have enjoyed had the matter been litigated in state court, including immunity from liability. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]