Search for: "State v. E. B."
Results 281 - 300
of 10,005
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 23 NY3d at 247; see NY Const, art V, § 1; State Finance Law § 8 [1], [2], [2-b], [3], [7]). [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 10:12 am
e. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 10:00 am
§924(e)(2)(B) (emphasis added). [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 7:40 am
It can and does the Sixth Circuit has held in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 3:36 pm
§ 1677b(e). [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:32 am
Mann, 141 Fed.Appx. 175 (4th Cir.2005) (unpublished) (citing United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:09 am
”) Smith v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 23 NY3d at 247; see NY Const, art V, § 1; State Finance Law § 8 [1], [2], [2-b], [3], [7]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 23 NY3d at 247; see NY Const, art V, § 1; State Finance Law § 8 [1], [2], [2-b], [3], [7]). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:39 pm
Today the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decided a wine-shipping case in Brooks v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 5:36 am
By K&L Gates John B. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:38 am
The State’s one-year limit for published privacy violations governs biometric privacy claims under only section 15(c) and 15(d), while claims under 15(a), 15(b) and 15(e) can be brought up to five years later, the three-judge panel ruled. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 12:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 10:27 am
The Third Circuit rejected De La Roca’s argument that Congress intended that the requirements contained in subsections (e)(2)(A) and (e)(2)(B) be interpreted in the disjunctive. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
Mainello challenged the requirement that he retire from his position upon his attainment of age 57 [RSSL Section 381-b(e)].He filed a lawsuit contending that the legislature’s action violated the state Constitution. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]