Search for: "State v. Ege"
Results 281 - 300
of 429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2014, 9:47 am
Other uses which combined “PINK” with the well-known “Victoria’s Secret” mark (eg in-store signage and social media pages, represented by use 2) did not infringe, as those types of use were unlikely to result in confusion. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:09 am
Where a work has been communicated by the same technical means as the initial communication (eg hyperlinking), then to have an act falling within the scope of Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive the work must be communicated to a ‘new public’. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:34 am
The fracas that occurred when COPE was established indicates some expected difficulties with that process - see Tune in live for ANC v COPE name battle. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 11:48 pm
In terms of one style of inferential theorizing, the meaning of a law is the fact whose probability is to be assessed, and the reports of the meaning of the law—eg, the language in a book, committee reports, and the like—are treated as evidence. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:04 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
They are permitted in the UK (but we do not see them often), and in other EU Member States, such as Sweden, where this case originated, as well as elsewhere (such as in the US). [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
FIL Ltd v Fidelis Underwriting [2018] EWHC 1097, High Court of England and Wales (May 2018)The use of FIDELIS for specialty insurance and reinsurance services does not infringe FIDELITY for financial services, holds Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 10:32 am
Frees, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
For instance, in an order handed down earlier this year in Høeg v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:02 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
As the law seems to stand at the moment, per the case of Tiensia v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 4:43 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York found that the 2010 amendment to Rule 14a-8(i)(8) did not change its original holding in Lucian Bebchuk v Electronic Arts. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 3:13 am
The decision in Crane v Canons Leisure Centre [2007] EWCA Civ 1352 may need to be reversed.All these proposals are designed to reduce costs disputes and reduce the cost of costs disputes. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:37 am
In the case of Ivorian League For Human Rights (Lidho) And others v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am
The Committee found that as paramilitary groups advanced into the political arena, egged on by the former president, they were often welcomed by pro-Trump operatives, Republican organizers, and others who said they were trying to “Stop the Steal. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:52 pm
"); Power Test Petroleum Distr., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
BootsDeckers Outdoor Corporation v J.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:00 am
In Sisvel v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 12:07 pm
See Schmuck v. [read post]
