Search for: "State v. Fees" Results 281 - 300 of 20,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am by Guest Author
” As stated by Justice Rehnquist in his concurring opinion in Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:31 am by Linda Panszczyk
As for the injunction, the Fifth Circuit agreed with Rolex that the district court should have enjoined the sale of Rolex watches with non-genuine bezels, thus affirming, as modified, the district court’s injunction in part (Rolex Watch USA, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Meredith R. Miller and Laura Dooley
  It also requires consideration of the conventional wisdom about who benefits from litigating in federal court and how that informs litigation strategy, as well as very recent legislative initiatives aimed at unveiling the beneficial owners of LLCs.Federal v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:40 am by Unknown
For inaction on that risk to constitute bad faith, the court stated, the plaintiff would have to plead more that he did.Waste. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs maintain that Sciocchetti incurred additional legal fees in the divorce action, but failed to allege how such fees were attributable to defendant’s concealment of the relationship with the wife (see Mizuno v Barak, 113 AD3d 825, 827 [2d Dept 2014]). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:30 am by Alysa Z. Hutnik
As of January 1, 2024, the State of Maryland’s new telemarketing law, the “Stop the Spam Calls Act of 2023,” officially became law. [read post]