Search for: "State v. First Judicial Dist."
Results 281 - 300
of 1,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
New York County Dist. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:49 am
Dist. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 4:45 am
On the first point, it is well-settled that, "except in extraordinary circumstances, a federal court should not enjoin a pending state proceeding that is judicial in nature and involves important state interests," see JMM Corp. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. (2010) 48 Cal.4th 310 (“ConocoPhillips”); Neighbors for Smart Rail v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
The First District recently brought further clarity to the baseline setting rules in such contexts, as well as the public trust doctrine, in its published opinion in Citizens for East Shore Parks v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 11:18 am
In Latinos Unidos de Napa v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
Dist. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:32 am
App. 1st Dist. 2014). [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
[Rohrmoos] materially breached the lease agreement first. 2. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Deference Somewhat Reduced: Class Action Where Plaintiff Asserts State Law Claims, But Substantially Similar, Nationwide Litigation Is Pending Elsewhere At first blush, in cases where an in-state plaintiff files a state-wide class action asserting state law claims only, it may seem that plaintiff’s choice of forum would be given great weight. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Deference Somewhat Reduced: Class Action Where Plaintiff Asserts State Law Claims, But Substantially Similar, Nationwide Litigation Is Pending Elsewhere At first blush, in cases where an in-state plaintiff files a state-wide class action asserting state law claims only, it may seem that plaintiff’s choice of forum would be given great weight. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Deference Somewhat Reduced: Class Action Where Plaintiff Asserts State Law Claims, But Substantially Similar, Nationwide Litigation Is Pending Elsewhere At first blush, in cases where an in-state plaintiff files a state-wide class action asserting state law claims only, it may seem that plaintiff’s choice of forum would be given great weight. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:26 pm
(AT&T California, RPI) (1st Dist. 2014) ___ Cal.App.4th___, 2014 WL1694992. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:13 am
Dist. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:54 pm
Dist. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
—Houston [1st Dist.] [read post]
17 May 2013, 3:26 pm
Dist. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:24 pm
On April 6, 2020, the Judicial Council issued Emergency rule 9, which tolled all civil statutes of limitation until 90 days after the state of emergency was lifted. [read post]
