Search for: "State v. Flowers&nbsp " Results 281 - 300 of 581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 10/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022… [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:06 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June… [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Legal Insurrection, Cody Wisniewski reluctantly predicts based on the oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am by Guest Blogger
   ;           So too, the lawyersof the late medieval ius commune in the 12th to 15th centuries, both before and after the advent of civic republicanism as usually defined, engaged in endless debates over the legal relationships among empire, monarchies like that of France, and the paradigmatic republican city-states of Italy… [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Washington, the case of “a Washington State florist who refused for religious reasons to make custom flower arrangements for a same-sex wedding. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am by Jocelyn Hutton
  On Wednesday 1st December, the Court will hand down judgment in Fratila and another v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At National Review’s Bench Memos blog, Kristen Waggoner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 25/5/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm by Shams Hirji
It’s perhaps worth noting as well that the OSHA cases may feature the debut Supreme Court arguments for the current Ohio Solicitor General, Ben Flowers (representing the State challengers), and for Steven P. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:57 am by Guest Blogger
  These arguments often spoke in the register of the affirmative constitutional duty of legislators to act, rather than the register more familiar today, of constitutional constraints on what the state can do. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm by Daniel Nazer
” Patent claims like these are almost surely invalid under the Supreme Court’s Alice v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court will also consider the conflicting approaches in  Binbuga v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 551 and HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 1176 as to the relevance of evidence in relation to the foreign criminal’s rehabilitation and how much weight should tribunals accord to such evidence in the context of the above tests. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Andrea Katz  In 1905, an Australian parliamentarian observing the United States used an unusual metaphor to describe our Constitution. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an… [read post]