Search for: "State v. Flowers&nbsp " Results 281 - 300 of 581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Andrew Hamm
On Wednesday, the justices hear oral argument in Flowers v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Staff
Subsequent to the FDA approval of Epidiolox, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Order placing “FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols” [such as Epidiolox] in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act,”  “Schedule V drugs are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse compared to other scheduled drugs and a low potential for psychological or… [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Fast forward to 2019:  OIL attorneys simply cannot keep up quite as easily as before with the flood of immigration class actions and suits seeking to enjoin Executive Branch decisions to terminate Temporary Protected Status, DACA, and employment authorization for F-1 foreign students, and institute family-separation and child-imprisonment not to mention DOJ lawsuits asking federal courts to allow withholding of grant funds to sanctuary cities and states. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
Hence, infringement was ascertained.Trade mark and copyright infringementTurning to the catalogue (which also contains reproductions of Girl with Balloon ;and Rage, the Flower Thrower), the judge excluded that peculiar copyright status of street art would require consideration:[T]he exhibition in progress in Milan consists of copies of works by the artist acquired by private parties and which have been commercialized with the… [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
Patentlyo discusses the question if the United States Government counts as "a person who is not the owner of a patent" in case Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak writes that in Flowers v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lee Electric, Inc. v City of New York, 119 AD3d 652 (2d Dept 2014); Flowers v 73rd Townhouse, LLC, 99 AD3d 431 (JS1 Dept2012). [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the spring, the courtyards are full of blooming fruit trees and blossoming flowers. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 3:10 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Here is the write up in SCOTUSBlog In Flowers v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]