Search for: "State v. Grey"
Results 281 - 300
of 533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2010, 5:28 pm
Gray v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:33 pm
Pilley of Harper Grey LLP. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 7:03 am
Grey’s website stresses his actions in the state legislature to protect Central Valley access to water. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 11:56 am
The case is Bowens v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:42 pm
There will always be grey areas surrounding the ambit of protection for a trade mark, but is the grey area even larger (and unnecessarily so) in [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:39 am
| Roger in troubled Waters Never Too Late 159 [week ending Sunday 6 August] Cross-undertaking in damages - Napp Pharmaceuticals v Sandoz Limited | In memoriam of June Foray: the greatest screen voice whom you probably never heard of, but likely heard | UK Supreme Court holds that grey market sales can be criminal offence | New administrative notice-and-takedown procedure in Greece | Are you XKING kidding me? [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used interchangeably, opponents of parallel imports… [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 1:11 pm
The seminal case in the State of New Jersey, regarding engagement rings is Aronow v Silver, 223 N.J. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:11 pm
Wholesale Auto Direct) v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Neff’s Justice in Blue and Grey. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
The fact that a platform has some or a significant degree of sophistication (as it is for instance the case of YouTube) should not mean that the platform is not a mere facility.Watching Grey's Anatomy instead of studying (on a lawful copy of)Gray's AnatomyPrimary v secondary liability Fifthly (also this follows from point 3 above), the AG rejects the idea that secondary liability has now been absorbed within the harmonized primary liability regime. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Klarfeld of Grey Plant Mooty. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 8:00 am
United States - see S2KM's Murphy wiki Arkansas DHS v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In the most recent case on the topic, Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 7:10 pm
Back in 2006, the 5th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:16 pm
Pilley of Harper Grey LLP. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
Additionally, the court referred to a landmark Supreme Court case, Carpenter v United States,[3] and noted that the purpose of the Fourth Amendment was to safeguard privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
