Search for: "State v. Hollingsworth"
Results 281 - 300
of 336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
United States (appeals court applying heightened scrutiny only) A fifth case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
United States (appeals court applying heightened scrutiny only) A fifth case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 4:20 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The proposed lines dividing each of the six new states are provisional; under Draper’s proposal, over the next few years, any county that adjoins any of the proposed states can choose to become part of that contiguous state, provided that the counties that are provisionally in that neighboring state also agree to add such a county. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
Fourth, if an individual is subject to a new order of a state regulator, then an alert is sent out to all other state regulators as well as FINRA through the CRD. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
Coogan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
His dissent ten years later in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In one case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:05 pm
But there are also about 150 more cases in New Jersey state court, a jurisdiction where plaintiff lawyers typically harbor high hopes. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:47 pm
… There’s no connection to the United States whatsoever. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Solo v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
The answer was not immediately clear, particularly as the Court issued a ruling the very same day in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
Supreme Court’s standing ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:59 pm
In the second case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:55 pm
Their brief in opposition was filed in the pending case of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
And in a summary order, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
This is a perspective that also conflates public and private law views of entities, be they states or corporations. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:33 am
See Messick v. [read post]
