Search for: "State v. Janet" Results 281 - 300 of 532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 7:13 pm by Josh Blackman
Recently, Janet DiFiore, the Chief Judge of New announced that she would resign at the end of August. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:03 pm by Susan Brenner
Fimia stated that she `would be happy to share the e-mail with Ms. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
Hance, Jr. 164,625 161,730 — — — 330,535 V. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:55 am by jlucivero
With this sweeping new rule, New York has become the first state in the nation to require all of its criminal trial judges to issue so-called “Brady orders” in every case (named after the 1963 case of Brady v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:33 am
The potential roadblocks -- her involvement in the controversial Ricci v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm by admin
The letter, signed by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Attorney General Eric Holder, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, and Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair, explained that the Thomson facility “will serve dual purposes. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:49 am
Here is the abstract:The egalitarian voice of the United States Supreme Court resonates forty years after it abolished anti-miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
Here are the noteworthy posts of the week: Trade Secret and Covenant Not to Compete Posts, Cases and Articles:  In the latest high profile battle over which state's law should apply (i.e., California v. every other state), sports agent Aaron Mintz is battling his former employer Priority Sports & Entertainment over the enforceability of his non-compete. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:18 am by SHG
  And following a decision out of the Bronx by Judge Edgar Walker in People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
Thornton (1995) -- rejected state imposition of term limits on members of Congress, holding that the Constitution prohibits states from adopting congressional qualifications in addition to those enumerated in the Constitution.Clinton v. [read post]