Search for: "State v. Jeffrey T. M."
Results 281 - 300
of 467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
” Writing for the National Law Journal’s Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports on yesterday’s oral argument in M&G Polymers USA v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
I’m sure there were more attorneys from Riccolo & Semelroth involved, but we’ll go with Pressley today. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Shields (a/k/a Jeffrey D. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 10:29 pm
T. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 3:19 pm
The case is Haart v. [read post]
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
BERNARD COOKS, In his individual capacity, RANDY T. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Here at least the labor specialization of states has produced something quite interesting. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
I will be writing more about the UCC Article 3 v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
NFP civil opinions today (8): Jeffrey M. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:57 am
“I’m going to fight back. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:14 pm
With the justices slated to consider in the fall a Mississippi abortion law intended to challenge Roe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:36 am
(Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead & Watts v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
John M. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am
What this meant is that colleges didn’t subject themselves to liability to the accuser by imposing a lesser remedy than expulsion, and that the circuit was emphasizing a return to the criteria stated by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:14 am
(I'm meeting shortly with Jeffrey Segal, uber-Court-number-cruncher; maybe I'll ask him whether there are any data on something like this.) [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Patton v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm
The discussion turned to AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
