Search for: "State v. Jose V."
Results 281 - 300
of 1,488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2018, 5:22 pm
" That's putting it diplomatically.Congrats to DAG Jose Zelidon-Zepeda, who represented the State in this matter. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:54 am
United States, which involves an exception to the double jeopardy clause that allows a defendant to be prosecuted for the same crime in both federal and state court, for state-court prosecutions of potential recipients of presidential pardons; in an accompanying essay on his eponymous blog, he discusses the relation between originalism and stare decisis as invoked by Justice Brett Kavanaugh during the Gamble In an op-ed for The New York… [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:27 pm
The Delaware court had previously decided a similar matter in Ascension Insurance Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am
First up is Dawson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 8:23 am
Supreme Court sided with the Texas courts in Medellin v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:31 am
“Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor Jose Borges moved, pursuant to CPLR 5225 and 5240, to compel assignment of Defendant/Judgment Debtor Alfred Placeres’s potential legal malpractice claim against Defendant’s friend and former attorney to satisfy Plaintiff’s judgment (motion sequence 023). [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:25 am
V. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:34 pm
Xu, a deputy division director with the MSS’s Jiangsu State Security Department, is the first Chinese intelligence officer to be extradited for prosecution in the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 11:15 pm
Qualcomm argues, as it did (unsuccessfully) in San Jose, that the consumer plaintiffs "provided no plan whatsoever to process, verify, and administer more than one billion claims—a herculean task for any claims administrator. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:30 pm
But this week, SCOTUS heard oral argument in Gundy v. [read post]
Qualcomm's Mannheim Steamroller is stuttering: patents too young to defeat Apple in tech-savvy court
3 Oct 2018, 11:22 am
The first Qualcomm v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 8:20 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 4:26 pm
“Necessity” is the mother of discretion.United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 2:19 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 12:07 pm
David Lundberg, No. 114,897 (Sedgwick)State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 7:23 am
Judge Schroeder dissented (McCray v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
In оthеr wоrdѕ, federal and state gоvеrnmеntѕ may рlасе tаx liens fоr unраіd іnсоmе tаxеѕ, whіlе lосаl gоvеrnmеntѕ mау рlасе tаx lіеnѕ fоr unраіd lосаl income… [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 8:47 am
Four months prior to the FTC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 10:32 am
In 2014, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Navarette v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
More likely the state will do what elites do everywhere--they ignore these engagements and to the extent possible undermine their authors. [read post]
