Search for: "State v. K. A. M." Results 281 - 300 of 2,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Symposium: Masterpiece Cakeshop and compelled participation in religious ceremonies
12 Sep 2017, 7:18 am by Mithun Mansinghani
Michael K. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Argument preview: Upstream rights, downstream woes
8 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The U.S. government, as an amicus, supports Wyoming; arguing for the U.S. will be William M. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Protocol Amending the Ballistic Missile Defense Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Poland
6 Jul 2010, 9:57 am by PJ Blount
Article VII Paragraph 2 of Article V is amended as follows: 1. [read post]
Res Communis - http://rescommunis.olemiss.edu/
WA Legal Roundup – Div III: Estate can pursue for economic damages regardless of beneficiaries; pursuing other work gets jobless benefits for partial self employed; Employment Law Sucks; Purses are Cars; Capitol Hill Block Party
19 Jul 2011, 9:28 am by Justin Walsh
In Wilson v. [read post]
The Amateur Law Professor - http://theamateurlawprofessor.com
[Eugene Volokh] Challenge to N.M. Governor's Ban on Public Gun Carry in Albuquerque and Surrounding County
10 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Thanks to Louis K. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Court to hear new Enron case
13 Oct 2009, 7:11 am
The Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to rule on claims that “searing media attacks” on longtime Enron executive Jeffrey K. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
"some rights to property which he is entitled to"
16 Aug 2015, 9:06 pm by Alfred Brophy
 Justice Thomas Ruffin's opinion in State v. [read post]
The Faculty Lounge - http://www.thefacultylounge.org/
General Court rejects 5-stripes shoe mark
13 Dec 2015, 10:43 pm
The same thought apply mutatis mutandis to paragraphs 49 to 51 and 77 of the judgment of 6 November 2014 in Vans v OHIM (Representation of a wavy line), T‑53/13, also invoked by K-Swiss. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
Appellate Division held employee sufficiently alleged that, due to his race and/or gender, his sexual harassment complaint was not taken seriously or appropriately investigated by the employer and he was disciplined more harshly than other employees
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Appellate Division held employee sufficiently alleged that, due to his race and/or gender, his sexual harassment complaint was not taken seriously or appropriately investigated by the employer and he was disciplined more harshly than other employees
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Applying the lenient notice-pleading standard afforded to discrimination claims (Vig v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., 67 AD3d 140, 145 [1st Dept 2009]), plaintiff alleged that he was subjected to race discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) (Executive Law § 296) and New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
New Law To Require Employers That "Willfully" Misclassify Employees As Independent Contractors To Pay Penalties And Wear Scarlett Letter
2 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm by AALRR
Andre and Scott K. [read post]
AALRR Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://aalrremploymentlawblog.blogspot.com/
Section 230 Doesn’t Apply to High Schoolers’ Online Bullying–Kutchinski v. Freeland Community School District
9 Jun 2023, 8:57 am by Eric Goldman
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Sanchez v France: Are the Expanded Liability Rules Foreseeable for Social Media Users – Meri Baghdasaryan
14 Aug 2023, 4:32 am by INFORRM
Finally, Judges Wojtyczek and Zünd state that the Court’s case law on a politician’s free speech is diverse and complex. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Court of International Trade says no to jurisdiction over salmon dispute, but notes ability to hear future cases
19 May 2009, 4:47 am
” K Mart Corp., 485 U.S. at 185. [read post]
ESA blawg - http://www.esablawg.com/esalaw/ESBlawg.nsf
Third party lien calculations differ in paying Federal vs State Workers’ Compensation Liens
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am by Jo Ann Hoffman & Associates, P.A.
  See Manfredo v. [read post]
Florida Injury Attorneys Blog - https://www.joannhoffman.com/blog/
People v. Jackson: The Judge Was High — The Judges Still Are
25 Oct 2012, 1:53 pm by Rick
The appellate court in People v. [read post]
Probable Cause - http://www.rhdefense.com/blog
This week in the military appellate courts.
11 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
Court-Martial Trial Practice - http://court-martial-ucmj.com/
Law and Media Round Up – 2 March 2020
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The tabloid accused Headley of being a “cosmetic cowboy”, falsely stating that she had botched the treatment of customers. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Facebook Entry and Blog Post May Support Retaliation Claim – Stewart v. CUS Nashville
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 am by Venkat
BeckonEmployee Blogging RisksEmployee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim -- Barnett v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Taxes From A To Z (2015): V Is For Veterans’ Benefits
3 Apr 2015, 5:14 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Next up: V is for Veterans’ Benefits Under the Tax Code, income is reportable and taxable unless otherwise excluded. [read post]
taxgirl - http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/