Search for: "State v. K. K. C."
Results 281 - 300
of 2,273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2021, 9:31 pm
In that SWM v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
”[29] Therefore, the assumptions in this analysis call into question the sufficiency of the grave-danger determination because they produce an estimate in which “the actual number of lives saved is uncertain, and is likely to be substantially less than [the stated basis for the grave-danger determination]. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Bd. of Bar Examiners, decided today by Magistrate Judge Steven C. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 3:13 pm
C. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:50 am
” Cohn v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
Narratives of litigation abuse were rampant in the national media and gaining steam in Washington, D.C., from the K Street lobby firms to the halls on Capitol Hill. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:18 am
Choi (NYU), and Adam C. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:29 am
European Court of Human RightsMagyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
§ 3004(c)(1). [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm
John K. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:36 am
v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 2:32 pm
Importantly, as the SEC recognized, the United States Supreme Court held in Aaron v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
Sierra Watch v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm
K. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 6:05 am
From SSRN:Linda C. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm
The Panopticon blog has a post on the recent CJEU decision in the case of Peterson v Google LLC C-682/18 and C-683/18 – a copyright case which deals with the protections given hosting platforms by the E-Commerce Directive. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
