Search for: "State v. Leon"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2019, 1:55 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Here, accepting the allegations in the complaint as true and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87), the complaint sufficiently stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 11:16 am
United States v. [read post]
A Lawsuit Seeking The Transfer Of Title In Real Property Is Only In County Where Property Is Located
10 Dec 2009, 1:13 pm
Sanderson, 715 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); State Dep’t. of Nat’l Res. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 4:17 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 11:18 pm
State, 371 Ark. 599, 606, 269 S.W.3d 326, 331 (2007) (quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:11 pm
” United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Judge Newman further challenges Jaffer, reiterating his contention that a Vaughn index is too vague to be useful and stating that this case is primarily about the OLC-DOD memo. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
"On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference" (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
"On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference" (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
Immigration QuotasAmalia Pallares, Undocumented Activism, Immigrant “worthiness” and access to citizenshipBook session: Eileen Boris and Jennifer Klein, Caring for America: A Conversation on Home Care Workers, Race, Gender, and the Welfare State Leon Fink -- ChairKimberly Morgan -- DiscussantNancy MacLean -- DiscussantCynthia Cranford -- DiscussantKaren Flynn -- DiscussantEileen Boris -- AuthorJennifer Klein -- Author Negotiating Anew National Legislation… [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
Finally, in the midst of Chinese exclusion, the Supreme Court handed down the most significant citizenship case it ever decided, United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:16 pm
v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:08 am
The Memorandum Opinion in Beaty v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 3:11 am
In Loadholt v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 4:10 am
United States v. [read post]
