Search for: "State v. Lessing"
Results 281 - 300
of 38,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Based on Supreme Court precedent, the extended statute of limitations will not apply to criminal prosecution of sanctions violations that have already become time-barred, but the effect on potential civil liability is less clear. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:25 pm
Prominent historical examples, like the liberal justices who advanced press freedom in New York Times v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
Interstate travel to get an abortion is a less costly alternative form of foot voting for many women. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
And in a way similar to the way a federal court in Montana treated that state’s TikTok ban last year, TikTok argued that the law would not even survive under a less-demanding “intermediate scrutiny” standard. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
And in a way similar to the way a federal court in Montana treated that state’s TikTok ban last year, TikTok argued that the law would not even survive under a less-demanding “intermediate scrutiny” standard. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:47 am
Machinists v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am
§ 503(a)(11) states, “At the time the State agency determines an erroneous payment from its unemployment fund was made to an individual due to fraud committed by such individual, the assessment of a penalty on the individual in an amount of not less than 15 percent of the amount of the erroneous payment. [read post]
7 May 2024, 8:47 am
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard): On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
To be sure, this is less likely to be effective, because the universities would have less effect on the state's policies, but who knows? [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Claymont and Hockessin, Delaware, are at the northernmost part of the State, each less than a mile from Pennsylvania. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
However, to paraphrase Justice Stephen Breyer, writing in Heffernan v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
Nygard, 2022 ONCJ 20 Those cases, spanning less than a decade, are R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
Nygard, 2022 ONCJ 20 Those cases, spanning less than a decade, are R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:43 am
See Adolph v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:58 am
., v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
