Search for: "State v. Mann" Results 281 - 300 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2018, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Plaintiff’s claim for legal malpractice in connection with an underlying settlement fails to state a cause of action in the absence of allegations that the “settlement . [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Dennis Crouch
Mann Foundation for Scientific Research, et al., No. 20-362 Notice and Damages: Arctic Cat Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann has this blog’s analysis of Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s first Supreme Court opinion, in Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann previewed the cases for this blog; at Fortune, Roger Parloff breaks down the issues in the cases. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
Mann, 18-1477, and National Review, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:21 am by Kevin Russell
As explained by Ronald Mann, the Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed as improvidently granted the case of Emulex Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 2:26 pm
Mann J was right that "facilitating" required practical benefits and that, so far as the question of infringement was concerned, Siemens was entitled to rely on any means by which the wax in Thorn's product made through-plating and soldering through the coating easier in a practical sense.* The specification stated that, in a "final process step" the coating was fused to the board by further heating. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” Ronald Mann analyzes Monday’s argument in McGirt v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
This blog’s Ronald Mann also covered yesterday’s ruling in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am by Ivo Emanuilov (KU Leuven)
The facts of the case On 21 November 2023, Sir Anthony Mann of the London High Court handed down a judgment in the case of Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] EWHC 2948 (Ch). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained the lower court's action.The court, citing Mann v Abel, 10 NY3d 271, explained that a defamatory statement constituting "pure opinion" is not actionable under New York State Law because expressions of opinion, in contrast to assertions of fact, are deemed privileged and, no matter how offensive, cannot be the subject of an action for defamation.Here, however, the Appellate Division observed that although the subject email… [read post]