Search for: "State v. Mann"
Results 281 - 300
of 933
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
The decision was a strategic choice made in light of the lack of a meritorious defense (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292 [1st Dept 2001]). [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:20 pm
" (Fontani v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:07 am
" Mann, 161 S.W.3d at 834. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:49 am
The decision is Mann v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:22 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of TexasOpinion Date: 5/11/09Cite: Courtoom Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:20 am
The Judge adopted the approach laid down by Mann J in Rolawn Ltd v Turfmech Machinery [2008] EWHC 989 (Pat) and that of the Court of Appeal in Landor & Hawa International Ltd v Azure Designs Ltd [2007] FSR 9, explaining (at [22]) that “[t]his exclusion operates to limit the level of generality at which a definition of the design to be relied on can be stated: the more abstract the definition relied on, the more likely it is to fall foul of the… [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:45 pm
The panel features Anthony V. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:12 am
“Plaintiff’s claim for legal malpractice in connection with an underlying settlement fails to state a cause of action in the absence of allegations that the “settlement . [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:12 am
Mann saw it as Ms. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
Mann Foundation for Scientific Research, et al., No. 20-362 Notice and Damages: Arctic Cat Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 2:07 pm
Superior Court Judge Thomas V. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:08 am
Ronald Mann has this blog’s analysis of Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s first Supreme Court opinion, in Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am
Ronald Mann previewed the cases for this blog; at Fortune, Roger Parloff breaks down the issues in the cases. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am
Mann, 18-1477, and National Review, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:42 pm
Mann, When the going gets tough . . . [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:21 am
As explained by Ronald Mann, the Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed as improvidently granted the case of Emulex Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 2:26 pm
Mann J was right that "facilitating" required practical benefits and that, so far as the question of infringement was concerned, Siemens was entitled to rely on any means by which the wax in Thorn's product made through-plating and soldering through the coating easier in a practical sense.* The specification stated that, in a "final process step" the coating was fused to the board by further heating. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
” Ronald Mann analyzes Monday’s argument in McGirt v. [read post]
