Search for: "State v. McGuire" Results 281 - 300 of 336
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2008, 12:11 pm
Unfortunately not all sports agents are as likeable as Jerry McGuire. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:41 am
Although the Appellate Division noted that Garnes "was terminable without a hearing and without a statement of the reason for his dismissal," the court, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760 and Matter of Johnson v Kelly, 35 AD3d 297, said the Garnes failed to demonstrate that his termination was in bad faith, unlawful, or for an impermissible reason. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 am
Although the Appellate Division noted that Garnes "was terminable without a hearing and without a statement of the reason for his dismissal," the court, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760 and Matter of Johnson v Kelly, 33 AD3d 297, said that Garnes failed to demonstrate that his termination was made in bad faith, was unlawful, or was for an impermissible reason. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:06 am
After all, the plight of people who could be negatively affected by the recent Supreme Court case upholding Indiana's voter ID law (Crawford v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:00 am
McGuire $72,650 $32,180 $20,370 — $125,200 Mary Lake Polan, M.D. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court issued its decision in MeadWestvaco Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:08 am
McGuire, etc., et al., United States Circuit Court of Appeals, 3d Cir., April 1, 2008 [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 2:56 am
United States of America for the use and benefit of E&H Steel Corporation v. [read post]