Search for: "State v. Milke" Results 281 - 300 of 760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2016, 4:46 am by Jon Hyman
But, this bill goes significantly further by stating that a pregnant worker does not have to “accept an accommodation that the employee chooses not to accept. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:17 am by Michelle Yeary
  At least one California state court said no – Simpson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:31 am by SHG
Disparate impact isn’t proof of racism, but rather gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of racism because proof of racial animus is often hard to identify and so the Supreme Court in the 1971 case of Griggs v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Cannabis Law Group
However, the issue has been muddled in Michigan, where the Court of Appeals had to take on the issue in Michigan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Sophia Gaulkin
Supreme Court’s 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:10 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
" I ran across it this morning as I was preparing to teach United States Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm by Fanny Ferdman
Prohibition Against Workplace and Hiring Discrimination Related to Pregnancy and Nursing The law expressly adds the following as protected categories against discrimination to the Massachusetts state code, Chapter 151B: “Pregnancy or a condition related to said pregnancy, including, but not limited to, lactation, or the need to express breast milk for a nursing child. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm by Fanny Ferdman
Prohibition Against Workplace and Hiring Discrimination Related to Pregnancy and Nursing The law expressly adds the following as protected categories against discrimination to the Massachusetts state code, Chapter 151B: “Pregnancy or a condition related to said pregnancy, including, but not limited to, lactation, or the need to express breast milk for a nursing child. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am by Jorge Miranda
For Part I click here, for Part II click here, for Part III click here, for Part IV click here, for Part V click here, for Part VI click here. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm by Margaret Wood
  The origin of this doctrine was hammered out in a 1908 United States Supreme Court case, Winters v. [read post]