Search for: "State v. Oxford"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,725
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
In the case of Fairhurst v Woodard [pdf] in the Oxford County Court, Judge Melissa Clarke held that security cameras and a Ring doorbell “unjustifiably invaded” the privacy of a neighbour, broke data laws and contributed to harassment. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:37 am
Oxford University Press Stuart, Gary L. (2004) Miranda: the Story of America’s Right to Remain Silent. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm
United States A new privacy bill is pending in Massachusetts would be the most revolutionary data-privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:17 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Garnett & Mitchell Koppinger, Tandon v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm
As a result, in the 1982 case Edgar v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm
As a result, in the 1982 case Edgar v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 4:50 am
Gerger v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 7:53 am
Avoiding recognition and enforcement abroad is not always possible; the August 2021 decision in Next Investments, LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:37 am
Thank you to the reader who recently alerted me to this important opinion: Campasano v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 12:51 am
Huri-Laws v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
Pfander, Cases Without Controversies: Uncontested Adjudication in Article III Courts (Oxford University Press, 2021).James E. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:34 pm
ItalyForza Nuova v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
Bank of the United States (1824) and Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833). [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 6:30 pm
[1]United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm
Amant v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
Tompkins that federal courts must apply state law in diversity cases as opposed to the Swift v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
(Although, in Tutun v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
The diverging approaches of the majority and the dissenters in United States v. [read post]