Search for: "State v. Padilla"
Results 281 - 300
of 793
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2012, 7:37 am
The court analyzed the Padilla retroactivity issue solely under Florida state law. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:49 am
Supreme Court decided in Padilla v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:30 am
See Narvaez v. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 9:42 am
Supreme Court ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 4:06 am
The Florida Supreme Court has held that the case of Padilla v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 6:58 am
Rumsfeld and Padilla v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 10:42 am
Because of Hurricane Sandy, the oral arguments in the Chaidez case, which presents the question of whether Padilla can be applied retroactively, is scheduled to take place tomorrow, having been moved from Tuesday, the day on which they were originally set to take place. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:13 am
The oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Chaidez v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:30 am
UNITED STATES In Padilla v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:02 am
United States, on the retroactivity of Padilla v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
United States (11-820), on retroactivity of the decision in Padilla v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
(11-820), on retroactivity of the decision in Padilla v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:44 am
US, which raises the question of whether the Court’s 2010 decision in Padilla v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 7:23 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 5:55 am
United States, No.11-00820, to consider the question of whether Padilla v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:44 am
United States, 11-820, the case seeking retroactive application of the holding in Padilla v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 9:31 am
United States , In Chaidez , the issue whether the ruling in Padilla applies to someone whose conviction became final before that ruling was announced. [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 2:49 pm
State, No. 2D12-800, the Second DCA certified a question of great public importance to the Florida Supreme Court as to the retroactivity of Padilla v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:40 pm
” See also United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm
United States – immigration removal case where after pleading guilty of a felony the individual was removed, and whether the attorney provided effective assistance of counsel where the attorney did not advise the immigrant of the immigration consequences of the guilty plea (what does “advise” mean; is the court’s decision in Padilla prospective or retrospective; how to make the Strickland standard workable); Evans v. [read post]
