Search for: "State v. Perkins"
Results 281 - 300
of 423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2017, 2:43 pm
Holder by Cody Perkins, 65 Administrative Law Review 427 (Spring 2013). [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 8:21 am
Perkins Coie had also been retained to challenge certain voting laws. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 3:05 pm
Similarly, in State v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:02 pm
(citing State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 10:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:08 am
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 5:17 pm
In Perkins v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 4:54 pm
Quakenbush v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:41 pm
OLIVE GOHEAGAN, as personal representative of the estate of MOLLY SWABY, individually and as assignee of JOHN PERKINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 7:09 am
Perkins, 12-126), clarification of how the Internal Revenue Service calculates the foreign tax credit (PPL Corporation v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
In the case of People v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:36 am
Perkins, 181 N.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The Supreme Court weighed in as well, and on July 24, 1974, Chief Justice Burger announced the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
“Jurisfiction,” unfortunately, is also something we see in our line of work, sometimes making us wonder whether the likes of Emperor Zhark, the Red Queen, and Pinky Perkins may have aliases who serve in the all-too-real judicial branches here in the States. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 11:43 am
In the Perkins Coie case, another firm targeted by Trump in an executive order, which was litigated only a few weeks earlier in the same jurisdiction, the stakes were stated clearly: “The chilling effect of this executive order threatens to undermine our entire legal system and the ability of all individuals to access justice in the American judicial system,” Judge Beryl Howell said. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
Perkins, 748 F.2d 1519, 1533 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(People v Perkins, 62 AD3d 1160, 1161 [3d Dept] [affirming defendant's conviction for Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second and Third Degrees; "Penal Law article 265 does not effect a complete ban on handguns and is, therefore, not a severe restriction' improperly infringing upon defendant's Second Amendment rights. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:49 pm
In Jam v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:41 pm
See also State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:03 pm
(workersxzcompxzkit) The court also observed that in Perkins v. [read post]
