Search for: "State v. Ping"
Results 281 - 300
of 335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm
(IPBiz) Australia FCA: No copyright in newspaper headlines: Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 10:22 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:35 pm
The government argued that a 1983 Supreme Court case U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
Post this to MySpace Submit this to Netvibes Add this to Ning Ping this on Ping.fm Share this on Reddit Stumble upon something good? [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:14 pm
in 2009 in the case,of United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:14 pm
in 2009 in the case,of United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:30 am
Post this to MySpace Submit this to Netvibes Add this to Ning Ping this on Ping.fm Share this on Reddit Stumble upon something good? [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 11:39 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 12:07 pm
The AmeriKat previously reported about the ping-pong Nokia v Apple patent litigation (here and here). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:24 am
Dismissed employee precluded from litigating her termination because of her failure to exhaust her administrative remediesMatter of Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health, 22 Misc 3d 1116(A)Yan Ping Xu, a New York City Research Scientist Level I, a position in the non-competitive class, was terminated from her position. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 9:24 am
Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:44 am
., et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
State, 922 So. 2d 961, 965, citing Waddle v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:01 pm
Via Above the Law, from Richard Posner: "Litigation is not ping-pong. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:03 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:30 am
Murray v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
More following the break...Judge Posner held:We assumed in Bullard v. [read post]
