Search for: "State v. R. W. S." Results 281 - 300 of 5,792
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
How often do we really talk about ornamentality and distinctiveness w/r/t defendant’sconduct? [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:45 am by Jocelyn Hutton
This Week in the Supreme Court – w/c 20th June 2022 Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 2:56 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 15/6/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October … [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  To mark this celebration of Sandy’s 40 years at the University of Texas, I want to argue that constitutional faith provides a path back to democracy in the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
(The challengers have appealed Raffensperger’s decision in the state courts, while Greene is appealing the federal court ruling refusing to bar the challenge before Raffensperger’s office.) [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:45 am by Jocelyn Hutton
From Monday 9th May – Tuesday 10th May, the Court will assess costs in Secretary of State for Health and others v Servier Laboratories Ltd and others [2020] UKSC 44. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:38 pm by Russell Knight
Pfiel, 197 Ill.2d 60, 70-71, 257 Ill.Dec. 899, 755 N.E.2d 1 (2001) “[W]here the facts and witness credibility are not in dispute, the ultimate question posed by the legal challenge to the trial court’s ruling…is reviewed de novo. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
In Sandy’s words, the five-justice majority in Bush v. [read post]