Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 281 - 300
of 9,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2022, 10:20 am
” Buck v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
One of the most intriguing cases on the Supreme Court’s docket this fall is Foster v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 5:08 am
In Grutter v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:46 am
Yet another Fourth Amendment case in pending before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Knights v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:31 pm
Ohio State Racing Commission, 210 N.E.2d 730 (Ohio Ct. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:38 am
My new column at The Hill explains the parallels between the recent SCOTUS opinion overruling Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
Sewer v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:54 am
In Richmond v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
(See Meads v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
" None other than The Race to the Bottom. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 2:39 am
United States: Race, Religion, and Congress’ Extraordinary Acquiescence, The abstract states: On... [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:50 pm
That was more than evident recently in a Washington Court of Appeals ruling.In a rather unusual move, Judge Anne Ellington, writing a concurring opinion in State of Washington v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:22 am
In Schuette v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm
Before the 1990s, legal scholars referenced United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm
Before the 1990s, legal scholars referenced United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:14 pm
Williams v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:18 pm
Vance v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:18 pm
Vance v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:08 pm
"UT Austin's Consideration of Race in Admissions is Narrow, Necessary and Constitutional": The University of Texas at Austin today issued a news release that begins, "Today, the University of Texas at Austin filed its brief to the United States Supreme Court as respondent in the case of Fisher v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:54 pm
Given that the motion was filed sometime after the expiration of the deadline stated in the court’s own scheduling order, that it would have constituted the supplier’s fourth amendment to its pleading, and that any attempt to add a new claim would have been moot in light of the ruling on the merits of the supplier’s existing claims, the lower court’s refusal to allow further amendment did not constitute an abuse of discretion.The decision is Race Tires… [read post]
