Search for: "State v. Rivers" Results 281 - 300 of 3,993
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
District Court for the Central District of California has dismissed the antitrust claims in Rock River Communications Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
No “anti-arbitrating” presumption to resolving grievances alleging a violation of a collective bargaining agreementWatertown CSD v Watertown Education AssociationIndian River CSD v Indian River Education AssociationCourt of Appeals, Nos. 50 & 51, joint decision issued 93 NY2d 132In numerous decisions, New York State courts have frowned on the use of arbitration to settle disputes between public employers and unions unless the collective… [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:48 pm by WIMS
Portland is directly across the Delaware River within 500 feet of Knowlton Township in Warren County, New Jersey. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:57 pm by Crescent Cheng
In a recent opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed in part the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California’s grant of summary judgment to the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) in Friends of the River v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:51 pm by Jeff Gittins
In July 2019, the Utah Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Rocky Ford Irrigation Company v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm by WIMS
The panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court's summary judgment in favor of United States agencies and officials in an action challenging the Bureau of Land Management's management of grazing within the Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument in Montana. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:28 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:00 am by Jessica Mendelson
On April 25, 2012, a federal judge in North Carolina sustained claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and conversion in a dispute between two pharmaceutical companies in the case of River’s Edge Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:26 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
” An argument, that was implicitly endorsed by the Supreme Court in Adolph when it stated that having the individual PAGA claim in arbitration and the representative claim in state court satisfied this requirement. [read post]