Search for: "State v. Rome"
Results 281 - 300
of 709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2017, 7:59 am
Čestmír Čepelka, Problem with the Inclusion of Aggression into the Rome Statute of the ICC Jan Ondřej & Magda Uxová, Islamic State, an Actor Threatening Peace in the Middle East Josef Mrázek, Some Critical Reflections on the Extended Use of Military Force in the Contemporary World Zuzana Trávníčková, Are Unilateral (Economic) Sanctions Really Impermissible under International Law? [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
Italy's Constitutional Referendum: A View From Italy in Conversation With Flora and Alessandro Sapio
3 Dec 2016, 7:43 pm
This post considers the constitutional referendum in broader context of the techniques and management of democratic engagement in Western liberal states. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 9:14 am
It instructs fact-finders, as the Court put it in Taylor v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 4:49 am
Cette procédure pourrait prendre plusieurs mois (Statut de Rome, article 15). [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:33 pm
Never Too Late 118 [week ending on Sunday 16 October] | Rome Court of First Instance rules that copyright exceptions for news reporting and criticism/review do not apply to entertainment TV programmes | It's a gas! [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am
Also at Public Books is a review of Benjamin Peters' How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet.A Fiery and Furious People: a History of Violence in England by James Sharpe is reviewed in The Times Literary Supplement and the New Statesman.Mary Beard discusses her SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome in the Los Angeles Review of Books.Cornelia Hughes Dayton and Sharon V. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:37 am
| Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
Procedural fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for HealthEibhlin Vardy brings us the second report covering the recent Monckton Chambers' seminar. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 6:36 pm
Last summer, the California Labor Commission ruled in Uber v Berwick that Uber workers in that state were employees, not contractors, based on the broad basis of control exerted by the company. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:37 am
"Also applicable under current technical and market conditionsThe AG held that such a conclusion based on the history and rationale of the Rome Convention would be also applicable in today's conditions. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
” Since 1776, the United States has authorized the use of military tribunals for trying espionage and aiding the enemy, neither of which are offenses against international law. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:36 pm
Art. 13 of the Regulation applies in the case of the scission of the estate even if only a part of the estate is located in a Member State and the declaration at hand does not concern this part. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am
Article 4(3) of the Rome II Regulation states that the law of another country applies if it is clear that the tort is manifestly more closely connected with it. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
| Weekly roundup: Friday Fun Never too late 107 [week ending on Sunday 31 July] Article 28 declarations |Costs of ISP blocking injunctions |Friday Fantasies, featuring legal challenges to Brexit and more |Huawei v Samsung |Hospira v Genentech |Questions on Article 3(b) SPC referred to CJEU |Book Review: Trade Secret Protection |Pokémon GoNever too late 106 [week ending on Sunday 24 July] |… [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
.* When its comes to "deadwood", leave it in the State of South Dakota and out of Trademark Office policyIs unused "deadwood"really cluttering up trade mark registers? [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:40 pm
” (Physicians for Human Rights v. [read post]
