Search for: "State v. S. D. M." Results 281 - 300 of 9,615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2009, 5:04 am
So, I can see the dissent's point on this issue, but I'm just not as persuaded. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:16 am
On Tuesday, I discussed the culmination of a recent case in the Ninth Circuit, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
  TEXAS No State Income Tax  UTAH 2.30 - 6.98 (t) 6 1,000 (b) - 5,501 (b) 2,550 (d) 5,100 (d) 2,550 (d) * (t) VERMONT (a) 3.6 - 9.5 5 30,650 (u) 336,551 (u) 3,400 (d) 6,800 (d) 3,400 (d) VIRGINIA 2.0 - 5.75 4 3,000 - 17,000 900 1,800 900 WASHINGTON No State Income Tax  WEST VIRGINIA 3.0 - 6.5 5 10,000 - … [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:48 am by Broc Romanek
The State's credit, budget and debt management (and not CDS prices) are the primary drivers of the State's borrowing costs. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:26 am
  It's by John Wagner.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:30 pm by Eric Goldman
No arguments from me on the policy conclusion, but I’d need to research the Lanham Act false advertising cases to see if this is actually consistent with the law (I’m pretty sure it isn’t). [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 9:42 am by Meg Martin
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]