Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 281 - 300
of 71,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2009, 3:22 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) P, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWCA Civ 701 (06 July 2009) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Downer, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1361 (06 July 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Home Office & Anor v The Information Commissioner [2009] EWHC 1611 (Admin) (06 July 2009) High Court (Queen’s [...] [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:43 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hovell v Ashford & St Peter’s Hospital NHS Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 670 (09 July 2009) Bedfordshire County Council v Dixon-Wilkinson [2009] EWCA Civ 678 (09 July 2009) Mackenzie, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWCA Civ 669 (09 July 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) F & Ors, R [...] [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:18 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Davis v R [2010] EWCA Crim 708 (31 March 2010) Greaves & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 709 (31 March 2010) Delucca, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 710 (31 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valentines Homes & Construction Ltd, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 345 (31 March 2010) Servier Laboratories Ltd v National Institute for Health and Clinical… [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:22 am
The US Supreme Court handed down this morning an important case about the relationship between federal prohibitions and state laws in Murphy v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 5:27 am
O'Neill in 1996, holding that de facto segregation violated the state's education clause. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:27 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clancy, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 8 (18 January 2012) Edwards (Formerly Steadman) v R [2012] EWCA Crim 5 (18 January 2012) Randhawa & Ors v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1 (18 January 2012) Hafiz & Orsl v R [2012] EWCA Crim 4 (18 January 2012) Randhawa v R [2012] EWCA Crim 3 (18 January 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horler v Rubin & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 5:04 pm
(Wheeling), R & V Associates Ltd. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
In a previous post, we considered the factual background to the appeals before the Supreme Court this week in the cases of R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:36 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
United States Patent and Trademark case have moved for Chief Judge Randall R. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 3:27 pm
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Velev, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2162 (12 September 2008) Thomas, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2151 (18 September 2008) Saldana, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2154 (23 September 2008) Belaid, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2153 (23 September 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) KS (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1080 (24 September 2008) Deutsche Bank AG &… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am
The post Case Comment: R (Nunn) v Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary [2014] UKSC 37 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 11:45 am
R. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 11:45 am
R. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 9:49 pm
Finta the principles outlined in R. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]
