Search for: "State v. STEVEN R."
Results 281 - 300
of 2,503
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows: (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred eighty-four thousand dollars of the payor's annual income; provided, however, beginning March first, two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes in the consumer … [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet Supreme Court cases—especially the 1991 ruling in Gregory v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 2:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:37 am
" Moore v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Don’t take my word for it, just read Geoffrey R. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court evaluated sobriety checkpoints (at which everyone must stop and submit to observation and answer some questions) under the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures, Justice Stevens, in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:00 am
The plaintiff, Ludgardo R. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Danny Patterson, a U.S. citizen, was working aboard the Luxembourg-flagged vessel M/V Simon Steven off the coast of Russia when he was struck by a cable and sustained injuries. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
His case, Marbury v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
None covered Stromberg, the first case in which a state law was found to violate the Freedom of Speech. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation Inforrm had a blog post from Steven Barnett “Journalists must not allow themselves to be used by unscrupulous politicians”. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
In Frese v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm
” Steven Peikin, the other Co-Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement stated: “We have repeatedly stated that issuers cannot avoid the federal securities laws just by labeling their product a cryptocurrency or a digital token . . . [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Steven E. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Bush v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
In Baca v. [read post]
