Search for: "State v. Silvas"
Results 281 - 300
of 383
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
Tamara de Silva November 28, 2011 Abstract: The collapse of MF Global is an unfortunate and watershed event for the futures industry. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm
The court has now issued a new opinion (Apilado v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:29 am
" It is seemingly defined as Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart said of pornography, "I know it when I see it" in Jacobellis v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Brown v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:37 am
(Emphasis added) Senior District Judge Arraj also quoted Silva v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 4:00 pm
Oregon v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:37 am
State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm
Silva, 380 F.3d 1018, 1019-20 (7th Cir. 2004); United States v.. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm
Silva, 593 F. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:23 am
This doctrine was ratified in the case of Silva v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
What are the lessons learned so far from the O104:H4 outbreak? [read post]
15 May 2011, 8:05 am
He raised religious issues only after he was cited for other infractions of TC rules.In Calderon-Silva v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:11 am
In Silva v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Again, this opinion is valid only for the State of Massachusetts and not Utah. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:04 pm
Bolling v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
See, e.g., Wiggins v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:11 am
’ In contrast to the Irish courts, Lady Hale emphasised the intrinsic importance of citizenship, including the value of ‘growing up and being educated’ in one’s own country, and pointed to the increasing emphasis on the child’s best interests in the Strasbourg case law, including in Uner v Netherlands (2006), Maslov v Austria (2007), and da Silva, Hoogkamer v Netherlands (2006). [read post]
