Search for: "State v. Singh"
Results 281 - 300
of 796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2008, 10:18 am
Now, hot on the heels, is this case: Singh v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 3:08 am
Citing Fedele v Seybert, 250 AD2d 519 [1st Dept 1998], and other Appellate Division cases, Justice Singh states that since Section 1104-a’s enactment, common-law dissolution claims have been sustained only in the most egregious circumstances, in which the majority was accused of systematic looting of corporate assets in flagrant disregard of the rights of the minority shareholders. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:28 am
I wonder how the Supreme Court declared Section 303 IPC unconstitutional in Mithu v State of Punjab. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
” Bigler, 451 F.3d at 733; Singh v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
However, the most authoritative precedent in support of the broader conception of casus omissus, OS Singh (OS Singh v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
The DOJ and Microsoft have both filed motions to dismiss as moot the seminal data privacy case before the Supreme Court this term, United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
The DOJ and Microsoft have both filed motions to dismiss as moot the seminal data privacy case before the Supreme Court this term, United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:40 pm
The case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Thanks to Tejinder Singh for the additional analysis in today’s Details. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm
The courts have traditionally been wary of allowing litigation to become an ancillary arena for the determination of the factual foundation for controversial topics (see the decision in British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:52 pm
Relying on Niranjan Singh Karam Singh v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: May 30, 2024Before: Kern, J.P., Singh, González, Pitt-Burke, Rosado, JJ. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: May 30, 2024Before: Kern, J.P., Singh, González, Pitt-Burke, Rosado, JJ. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:50 pm
It was not very long ago that courts were enjoined to base their determination on whether a certain position or tenet was a matter of spiritual belief (so as to attract the protection of Article 9) by the degree of sincerity with which it was held: see, for example, R(on the application of Sarika Watkins-Singh) v Aberdare Girls High School Governers (Defendant) and Rhondda Cynon Taf Unitory Authority and our comment on it. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 6:05 am
Electing the head of a state has turned into a political game; Brown v. [read post]
