Search for: "State v. Tennis" Results 281 - 300 of 319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2010, 4:01 am
Industries brought an action before the Court of First Instance, which held that the Board of Appeal had wrongly stated that the marks at issue were clearly distinct. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm by Aaron Kaufman
Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am by Mandelman
” According to records obtained from Missouri’s Secretary of State, the St. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:33 am by Peter J. Sluka
 Those changes met Court approval in Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v Chevron Corp., 73 A3d 934 [Del Ch 2013], and ATP Tour, Inc. v Deutscher Tennis Bund, 91 A3d 554 [Del 2014]. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:52 am by John Bursch
  For example, I was never even asked about Roe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm by Josh H. Escovedo
Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Gorsuch, released its decision in NCAA v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm by David Ryan
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
Deutscher Tennis Bund case when it upheld the facial validity of a fee-shifting by law. [read post]