Search for: "State v. Vessel"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 1:00 pm
The act by any person, being or not being one of the crew of a seagoing vessel or ship, of taking possession of such vessel by fraud or violence; c. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Here is the language from Shaffer v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am
Clarke LJ gave three key reasons in support of his conclusion: The structure of the Policy expressly stated that the insured perils were subject always to the exclusions. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:15 am
The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) handed down judgment in Credit Europe Bank N.V v The Admiralty Fund Comprising the proceeds of the sale of the mv Tarik III & Others on 13 October 2022. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:50 pm
The case is American Cargo Transport, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:56 am
In Cordani v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:33 am
Viscous Global Investment Ltd v Palladium Navigation Corp [2014] EWHC 2654 (Comm) The Claimants had claims for cargo damage against the vessel Owners arising under four bills of lading. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:17 am
Moench v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:17 am
Facts: This case (Botelho v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:59 pm
Our brief focuses on one question presented: May state regulation totally prohibit the free navigation of federally licensed vessels for five months of the year without violating the Supremacy Clause? [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 11:39 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:38 am
Mukherjee, The Use of LNG as a Marine Fuel: The International Regulatory Framework Christel Elvestad & Ingrid Kvalvik, Implementing the EU-IUU Regulation: Enhancing Flag State Performance Through Trade Measures Viatcheslav V. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
On February 15, 2012, Judge Brown, on the bench for the United States District Court in New Orleans, issued an interesting opinion in the matter of Snyder v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 10:16 pm
State officials previously sought a preliminary injunction forcing the builders to provide replacement engines, but the judge has not yet ruled on the motion. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:16 pm
State officials previously sought a preliminary injunction forcing the builders to provide replacement engines, but the judge has not yet ruled on the motion. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 10:16 pm
State officials previously sought a preliminary injunction forcing the builders to provide replacement engines, but the judge has not yet ruled on the motion. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm
As the District Court noted, the express purpose of the Vessel Fuel Rules "is to reduce air pollutants affecting the State of California by requiring ocean-going vessels to use cleaner marine fuels. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 3:48 am
United States of America v. [read post]
