Search for: "State v. Z. A. B." Results 281 - 300 of 418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
(Class 99) Component designs – General Court rules on informed user of a motor: Cases T 10/08 and T 11/08 Kwang Yang v OHIM – Honda (Class 99) Two stripes, three stripes and OUT: General Court decision in Case T-479/08 adidas v OHIM – Patrick Holding (Class 46) B&O speaker shape has appeal, so loses appeal: General Court decision in Case T-508/08 Bang & Olufsen v OHIM (IPKat) (Class 99) General Court upholds OHIM’s refusal of PAKI… [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
  So far as the IPKat is concerned, whenever he sees letters like z, v, c and b all hanging around in each other's company, the only game he can think of is the very considerably-protected Scrabble. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
– sound recording copyright royalties and cinematographic works (IP Osgoode) Century 21 v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
On the other hand, “a disclaimer should not remove more than is necessary […] to restore novelty […]” (see G 1/03 [headnote 2.2] and [3]).[5.5.1] The second paragraph of G 1/03 [3] states“However, the only justification for the disclaimer is to exclude a novelty-destroying disclosure […]. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am by Roshonda Scipio
(RES) TZ 2 SP33 2011 Civil Rights With all deliberate speed : implementing Brown v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
Walthers, Inc. d/b/a Darda Toys (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Can a forum selection clause prevent patent reexamination? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
Walthers, Inc. d/b/a Darda Toys (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Can a forum selection clause prevent patent reexamination? [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:36 am
városi Bíróság (step up, Tibor Gold, and tell us how to pronounce those precious syllables) has referred some questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling in Case C-180/11 Bericap Záródástechnikai Bt. v Plastinnova 2000 Kft. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:58 am by WSLL
Tyler, JudgeRepresenting Elk Ridge Lodge (Plaintiff/ Third-Party Defendant): Larry B. [read post]