Search for: "Stein v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 3:22 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]; see CPLR 3016 [b]; Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d 785, 787 [2021]). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:23 am
Sounds sanctionable, said the Ninth Circuit in Bappi Lahiri v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 11:13 am
§ 6103(e)(7).Stein v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 3:58 pm
State Personnel Board. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:44 am
Mayor of City of New York v Brady, 115 NY 599, 617 [1889]; United States v Throckmorton, 98 US 61, 68 [1878]), or part of a “larger fraudulent scheme” (Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 12:43 pm
See Stein v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
” The Review Board also considered the principles set out in Mazer v Stein (347 U.S. 201 (1954), which allowed a dancer-shaped lamp base to be protected under copyright), and found that the test was fulfilled in the present case as the designs could be perceived as separate from the useful article, the sneaker. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:25 am
In Leder v Spiegel(31 AD3d 246,267 [ 1” Dept 2006 the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that “[in order to state a cause of action for legal malpractice, the complaint must set forth three elements: the negligence of the attorney; that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and actual damages. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:25 am
Inc. v New York State Div. of Hous. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Stein, U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
Jeffrey Stein et al. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 8:42 am
For example, in Farm Labor Organizing Committee v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:57 am
The Commission rejected the respondents’ appeal based on the recent Tenth Circuit case Bandimere v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 6:26 pm
In Hosea v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Pickman v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 10:35 am
The 11th Circuit in Stein v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 12:49 pm
Indiana State Police v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
The Retromark update also listed the infamous Lidl v Tesco case, in which the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) reversed the copyright infringement finding but reluctantly upheld the trade mark infringement ruling; the Lifestyle Equities v Amazon case, where the UK Supreme Court confirmed that Amazon US was targeting UK consumers; and the commonly misunderstood Supermacs v EUIPO case where, the General Court of the EU merely stated that McDonalds’ use of… [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
